Nora Phillips v. U.S. Customs and Border Prot.
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision. The 9 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Jorge Cesar Ferretiz-Hernandez (11th Cir. 2025)
- United States v. Suquilanda (2d Cir. 2024)
- Black Emergency Response Team v. OConnor (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 2024)
- United States v. Gamez-Reyes (10th Cir. 2024)
- United States v. David Myrie (6th Cir. 2026)
- Christians in the Workplace Networking Group v. National Technology and Engineering Solutions (10th Cir. 2025)
- United States v. Junior Gonzalez-Nane (3d Cir. 2024)
- United States v. Sanchez-Felix (10th Cir. 2024)
- United States v. Quintanilla-Dominguez (10th Cir. 2024)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NORA PHILLIPS; ERIKA No. 21-55768 PINHEIRO; NATHANIEL DENNISON, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-06338- Plaintiffs-Appellants, SVW-JEM v. ORDER U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; MARK MORGAN; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; MATTHEW ALBENCE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; CHRISTOPHER WRAY, Defendants-Appellees.
Filed May 30, 2024 Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Richard C. Tallman, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
Order 2 PHILLIPS V. U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROT.
ORDER The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Plaintiffs-Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing, dkt. 58, is DENIED.
Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Tallman so recommended. Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Judge H.A. Thomas recused herself and did not participate in the deliberations or vote. Plaintiffs-Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc, dkt. 58, is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.