Estate of Daniel Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Estate of Daniel Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles (9th Cir. 2025)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ESTATE OF DANIEL HERNANDEZ, by No. 21-55994 and through successors in interest, Manuel
Hernandez, Maria Hernandez and M.L.H.; D.C. Nos. 2:20-cv-04477-SB-KS MANUEL HERNANDEZ, individually; 2:20-cv-05154-DMG-KS MARIA HERNANDEZ, individually,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
ORDER and
M.L.H., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem Claudia Sugey Chavez,
Plaintiff, v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES
POLICE DEPARTMENT; TONI
MCBRIDE,
Defendants-Appellees.
M.L.H., a minor, by and through her No. 21-55995 guardian ad litem Claudia Sugey Chavez,
D.C. Nos. 2:20-cv-04477-SB-KS Plaintiff-Appellant,
2:20-cv-05154-DMG-KS and
ESTATE OF DANIEL HERNANDEZ, by and through successors in interest, Manuel
Hernandez, Maria Hernandez and M.L.H.;
MANUEL HERNANDEZ, individually;
MARIA HERNANDEZ, individually,
Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES
POLICE DEPARTMENT; TONI
MCBRIDE,
Defendants-Appellees.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Judge Ikuta did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.