U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2025

United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan

United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 15, 2025
United States v. Markanthony Sapalasan

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30251 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-00130- v. TMB-MMS-1 MARKANTHONY DELEON ORDER SAPALASAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Filed January 15, 2025

Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Ryan D. Nelson, and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges.

Order 2 USA V. SAPALASAN

ORDER

The panel unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge R. Nelson and Judge Collins voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Hawkins recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. 49, is DENIED.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.