NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 25 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3399 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-01295-SPL-1 v. MEMORANDUM* KEIVIN CROSSWELL-CERVANTES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2025**

Before: GRABER, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Keivin Crosswell-Cervantes appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 168-month sentence for conspiracy to

distribute fentanyl and methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Crosswell-Cervantes’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal.

Crosswell-Cervantes has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

In the plea agreement, Crosswell-Cervantes waived his right to appeal the

conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record, see Penson v.

Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous issue as to whether the

appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88

(9th Cir. 2009). We therefore dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

DISMISSED.

2 24-3399