Rafael Diaz-Rodriguez v. Pamela Bondi
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Sotero Rivera-Mendoza v. Todd Blanche (9th Cir. 2026)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAFAEL DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ, No. 13-73719 Petitioner, Agency No. A093-193-920 v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.
Filed May 14, 2025
Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, Consuelo M. Callahan, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Sandra S. Ikuta, Daniel P. Collins, Patrick J. Bumatay, Lucy H. Koh and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.
Order 2 DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ V. BONDI
SUMMARY*
Immigration
The en banc court filed an order 1) terminating en banc proceedings; 2) stating that the case remains in abeyance pending resolution of Petitioner’s motion to reopen with the Board of Immigration Appeals and that, after the abeyance is lifted, the case will be reassigned to a randomly selected three-judge panel; and 3) relinquishing priority over the question whether a conviction for child endangerment under California Penal Code § 273a(a) is “a crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment” under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) in light of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369 (2024).
ORDER
En banc proceedings are terminated. This case remains in abeyance pending the resolution of Petitioner’s motion to the Board of Immigration Appeals to reopen his case. After the abeyance is lifted, this case is to be reassigned to a three- judge panel that will be randomly selected. We relinquish priority over the disposition of the question whether a conviction for child endangerment under California Penal Code § 273a(a) is “a crime of child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment” under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) in
DIAZ-RODRIGUEZ V. BONDI 3 light of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369 (2024).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.