NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 9 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR AUGUSTO AVELAR, et al., No. 23-4043 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A240-762-797 A240-762-798 v. A240-762-711 A240-762-712 PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, A240-762-710 Respondent. MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 6, 2025**

Before: SANCHEZ, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Augusto Avelar, Blanca Morena Palma-De Avelar, and their three

minor children are natives and citizens of El Salvador. They petition for review of

a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily dismissing

their appeal of an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Avelar’s and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Palma-De Avelar’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. “We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s summary

dismissal of an appeal.” Nolasco-Amaya v. Garland, 14 F.4th 1007, 1012 (9th Cir.

2021). We deny the petition.

1. In their brief, Petitioners offer no argument about the BIA’s summary

dismissal of their appeal. As such, Petitioners have forfeited any challenge to that

dismissal. See Hernandez v. Garland, 47 F.4th 908, 916 (9th Cir. 2022) (holding

that issues not “specifically and distinctly” argued in a party’s opening brief are

forfeited).

PETITION DENIED.2

1 Avelar’s and Palma-De Avelar’s children are derivative beneficiaries of their asylum applications. Their children did not, however, file separate applications for withholding of removal and CAT protection. See Ali v. Ashcroft, 394 F.3d 780, 782 n.1 (9th Cir. 2005) (stating that, unlike asylum, derivative relief is not available with respect to withholding of removal or CAT protection). 2 The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

2 23-4043