Robinson v. Naughton
Robinson v. Naughton
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 2 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DARYON ROBINSON, No. 23-1545 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cv-00210-MMD-CSD v. MEMORANDUM* DR. NAUGHTON, Medical Provider,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 6, 2025 Las Vegas, Nevada
Before: RAWLINSON, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Dr. Martin Naughton appeals the district court’s denial of his summary
judgment motion on qualified immunity. Dr. Naughton filed a notice of appeal
35 days after the district court entered its order on the docket. In a concurrently filed
opinion, we hold that 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) requires defendants to file a notice of
appeal within 30 days after entry of an order denying qualified immunity. McNeil v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Gittere, No. 23-3080, slip op. at 3 (9th Cir. Sep. 2, 2025). Because Dr. Naughton
filed his appeal more than 30 days after the district court entered its order denying
summary judgment on qualified immunity, it is untimely. We thus dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction.
The appeal is DISMISSED.
2 23-1545
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished