Robinson v. Naughton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Robinson v. Naughton

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 2 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARYON ROBINSON, No. 23-1545 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cv-00210-MMD-CSD v. MEMORANDUM* DR. NAUGHTON, Medical Provider,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 6, 2025 Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: RAWLINSON, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Dr. Martin Naughton appeals the district court’s denial of his summary

judgment motion on qualified immunity. Dr. Naughton filed a notice of appeal

35 days after the district court entered its order on the docket. In a concurrently filed

opinion, we hold that 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) requires defendants to file a notice of

appeal within 30 days after entry of an order denying qualified immunity. McNeil v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Gittere, No. 23-3080, slip op. at 3 (9th Cir. Sep. 2, 2025). Because Dr. Naughton

filed his appeal more than 30 days after the district court entered its order denying

summary judgment on qualified immunity, it is untimely. We thus dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction.

The appeal is DISMISSED.

2 23-1545

Reference

Status
Unpublished