NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 26 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-6789 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-08100-SPL-2 v. MEMORANDUM* RICK DRAKE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 17, 2025** Before: SILVERMAN, OWENS, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Rick Drake appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and 180-month sentence for aiding and abetting robbery and brandishing of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1153, and 2111, and 924(c).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Drake’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Drake has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

AFFIRMED.

2 24-6789