NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 14 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELLERY IBARRA-RAMIREZ, No. 25-785 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-085-570 v. MEMORANDUM* PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 19, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, HURWITZ, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Ellery Ibarra-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). whether the agency erred in applying the exceptional and extremely unusual

hardship standard to a given set of facts. Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi, 137 F.4th 996, 1003 (9th Cir. 2025). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Ibarra-

Ramirez has not shown exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to qualifying

relatives. See id. at 1006 (petitioner must show hardship “substantially beyond the

ordinary hardship that would be expected when a close family member leaves the

country” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). We reject as unsupported

by the record Ibarra-Ramirez’s contention that the agency failed to assess the

hardship in the aggregate.

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

The motion to stay removal is otherwise denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 25-785