NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-7681 D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00008-SAB-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM* MARWAN ABDULLAH NASSIR, AKA Marwan Abdullah Nasser, AKA Marwan A. Nasser, AKA Marwan Abdullah Alnasser,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley A. Bastian, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, HURWITZ, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Marwan Abdullah Nassir appeals from the district court’s judgment

revoking supervised release and imposing a sentence of 24 months’ imprisonment

and 36 months’ supervised release.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Nassir’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Nassir has

filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has filed a motion for

summary affirmance.

Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal.

Contrary to Nassir’s argument in his pro se brief, the 24-month prison term is

substantively reasonable in light of his breach of the court’s trust and the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e) factors, including the need to protect the public.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The government’s motion for summary affirmance and dismissal of appeal

is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

2 24-7681