United States v. Nassir

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-7681

D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00008-SAB-1 Plaintiff - Appellee, v.

MEMORANDUM* MARWAN ABDULLAH NASSIR, AKA Marwan Abdullah Nasser, AKA Marwan A.

Nasser, AKA Marwan Abdullah Alnasser,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley A. Bastian, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, HURWITZ, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Marwan Abdullah Nassir appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a sentence of 24 months’ imprisonment and 36 months’ supervised release.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Nassir’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Nassir has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has filed a motion for summary affirmance.

Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal. Contrary to Nassir’s argument in his pro se brief, the 24-month prison term is substantively reasonable in light of his breach of the court’s trust and the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors, including the need to protect the public.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The government’s motion for summary affirmance and dismissal of appeal is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

2 24-7681