United States v. Stevenson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Stevenson

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 18 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-3143 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:14-cr-00240-DC-1 v. MEMORANDUM* TORIANO STEVENSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dena M. Coggins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 12, 2025**

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Toriano Stevenson appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking

supervised release and imposing a sentence of 4 months’ imprisonment and 24

months’ supervised release.

Stevenson’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Stevenson has

not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

AFFIRMED.

2 25-3143

Reference

Status
Unpublished