U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2026

United States v. Wigmore

United States v. Wigmore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 20, 2026
United States v. Wigmore

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-4609 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:18-cr-00036-SPW-1 v. MEMORANDUM* JEROME LAWRENCE WIGMORE, Jr., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 18, 2026** Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Jerome Lawrence Wigmore, Jr. appeals from the sentence of 6 months’ imprisonment and 30 months of supervised release imposed following the district court’s revocation of supervised release.

Wigmore’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Wigmore has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

AFFIRMED.

2 25-4609

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.