United States v. Centeno Banegas

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 24 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-4876 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-00301-SI-2 v. MEMORANDUM* EDIS ODALIS CENTENO BANEGAS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 22, 2026** Before: CANBY, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Edis Odalis Centeno Banegas appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 108-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute fentanyl in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Centeno Banegas’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal.

Centeno Banegas has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

In the plea agreement, Centeno Banegas waived his right to appeal the conviction and sentence.

Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous issue as to whether the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).

We therefore dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

DISMISSED.

2 25-4876