United States v. Bradford

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 4 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-6026 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:12-cr-00126-TLN-1 v. MEMORANDUM* MARQUIST PIERE BRADFORD, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 29, 2026** Before: McKEOWN, TALLMAN, and MENDOZA, JR., Circuit Judges.

Marquist Piere Bradford appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month sentence.

Bradford’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Bradford has

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no non-frivolous arguments to be made on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

AFFIRMED.

2 25-6026