Torres-Cruz v. Blanche
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 1 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VICTOR HUGO TORRES-CRUZ, No. 25-7735 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-153-842 v. MEMORANDUM* TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 25, 2026** Before: SILVERMAN, N.R. SMITH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Victor Hugo Torres-Cruz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. evidence whether the agency erred in applying the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship standard to a given set of facts. Gonzalez-Juarez v. Bondi, 137 F.4th 996, 1003 (9th Cir. 2025). We review de novo questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Torres-Cruz has not shown exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to qualifying relatives.
See Gonzalez-Juarez, 137 F.4th at 1006 (petitioner must show hardship “substantially beyond the ordinary hardship that would be expected when a close family member leaves the country” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). We reject as unsupported by the record Torres-Cruz’s contentions that the agency erred in its hardship analysis.
The BIA did not err in declining to consider Torres-Cruz’s contentions regarding financial hardship that were raised for the first time to the BIA. See Honcharov v. Barr, 924 F.3d 1293, 1297 (9th Cir. 2019) (BIA did not err in declining to consider argument raised for the first time on appeal).
The motion to stay removal is denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 25-7735
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.