United States v. Tucker
United States v. Tucker
Opinion of the Court
On the following indictment:
The jurors of the United States for Washington County aforesaid, on their oaths to present Enoch Tucker, late of the county aforesaid, merchant, on the 14th day of December, 1846, with force and arms, at the county aforesaid, a certain road being a common highway leading from Bladensburg, Piscataway and the Alexandria Ferry to Bladensburg, known as the old Bladensburg Road, used for all the good citizens of the United States, and their horses, coaches, carts, wagons and carriages, to go, return, pass, re-pass, ride and labor in, on and along the same at their free will and pleasure, unlawfully and injuriously did obstruct and stop up by pulling and placing a certain wooden fence on and across the said common highway, &c., to the great damage and common nuisance of‘all the citizens going and returning, passing, repassing, riding and laboring in and along the said common highway, to the said example of all others in the like case offending and against the peace and Government of the United States.
P. B. Key,
United Stales Attorney.
He is charged in the indictment with closing the old road leading from Bladensburg to Piscataway, and which runs through his farm on the east side of the Eastern Branch of the Potomac River, and which, according to the evidence,
The Court adhered to the decision in the case of United States vs. Schwartz, who was charged with.the same offence, wherein it was decided that all public roads in the county must be shown as such from the public records of the Court, which was not done in this present case.
The District Attorney entered a nolle prosequi.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- United States v. Enoch Tucker
- Status
- Published