Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1901

89 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1901.

  • Hunt v. Whitehead 19 App. D.C. 116, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Campbell v. District of Columbia 19 App. D.C. 131, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • McCarthy v. Holtman 19 App. D.C. 150, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Sharer v. McHenry 19 App. D.C. 158, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Fletcher v. Barge 19 App. D.C. 174, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Alfred Richards Brick Co. v. Rothwell 19 App. D.C. 178, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Clerks' Investment Co. v. Sydnor 19 App. D.C. 89, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • United States v. Frizzell 19 App. D.C. 48, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Smith v. Olcott 19 App. D.C. 61, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Consumers' Brewing Co. v. Tobin 18 App. D.C. 584, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Brown v. Ohio National Bank 18 App. D.C. 598, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Macfarland v. United States ex rel. Miller 18 App. D.C. 554, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • District of Columbia v. Bakersmith 18 App. D.C. 574, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Tralles v. Metropolitan Club 18 App. D.C. 588, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • District of Columbia v. Roth 18 App. D.C. 547, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Alfred Richards Brick Co. v. Rothwell 18 App. D.C. 516, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Wole v. Hitchcock 18 App. D.C. 515, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Palmer v. Colladay 18 App. D.C. 426, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Mertz v. District of Columbia 18 App. D.C. 434, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Baltimore & Ohio Railway Co. v. Winslow 18 App. D.C. 438, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Macfarland v. Washington, Alexandria & Mount Vernon Railroad 18 App. D.C. 456, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Davis v. United States 18 App. D.C. 468, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Eckington & Soldiers' Home Railway Co. v. McDevitt 18 App. D.C. 497, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Palmer v. Augenstein 18 App. D.C. 511, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Stapleton v. Kinney 18 App. D.C. 394, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Fontano v. Robbins 18 App. D.C. 402, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Scott v. Scott 18 App. D.C. 420, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Blagden v. United States ex rel. Preinkert 18 App. D.C. 370, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Frisbie v. Cowen 18 App. D.C. 381, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Lanckton v. United States 18 App. D.C. 348, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Chamberlain v. Edmonds 18 App. D.C. 332, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Sanborn v. Maxwell 18 App. D.C. 245, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Mitchell v. Evans 18 App. D.C. 254, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Harten v. Brightwood Railway Co. 18 App. D.C. 260, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Latney v. United States 18 App. D.C. 265, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • United States v. Davis 18 App. D.C. 280, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • United States v. Chambers 18 App. D.C. 287, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Magruder v. Schley 18 App. D.C. 288, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Richards v. Bippus 18 App. D.C. 293, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Fedarwisch v. Alsop 18 App. D.C. 318, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Woolard v. Woolard 18 App. D.C. 326, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Miller v. Kelley 18 App. D.C. 163, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Adams v. Murphy 18 App. D.C. 172, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • McGee v. Welch 18 App. D.C. 177, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • In re Millett 18 App. D.C. 186, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Manning v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. 18 App. D.C. 191, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Tuohy v. Hanlon 18 App. D.C. 225, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Wallace v. States States 18 App. D.C. 152, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Stickel v. Stickel 18 App. D.C. 149, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
  • Austin v. Johnson 18 App. D.C. 83, (D.C. Cir. 1901)
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑