U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1903

Chappell v. O'Brien

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 3, 1903 · Shepard

22 App. D.C. 190; 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5523

Counsel

Mr. T. Percy Myers for the motion., Mr. Thomas C. Chappell and Mr. George Kearney opposed.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Clark v. DISTRICT DISCOUNT COMPANY, INC. (D.C. 1959)
Serkowich v. Wardell (D.C. Cir. 1938)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the court:

The motion to dismiss must be sustained. The orders entered are not final decrees disposing of the case. National Bank v. Smith, 156 U. S. 330, 333, 39 L. ed. 441, 442, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 358, and cases cited. Nor are they such interlocutory orders as are appealable under the act conferring jurisdiction upon this court. D. C. Code, § 226. It follows that both appeals must be dismissed, with costs; and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

A motion for a reargument was denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.