Chappell v. O'Brien
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Chappell v. O'Brien, 22 App. D.C. 190 (D.C. Cir. 1903)
1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5523
Chappell v. O'Brien
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court:
The motion to dismiss must be sustained. The orders entered are not final decrees disposing of the case. National Bank v. Smith, 156 U. S. 330, 333, 39 L. ed. 441, 442, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 358, and cases cited. Nor are they such interlocutory orders as are appealable under the act conferring jurisdiction upon this court. D. C. Code, § 226. It follows that both appeals must be dismissed, with costs; and it is so ordered.
Appeal dismissed.
A motion for a reargument was denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- CHAPPELL v. O'BRIEN
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appellate Practice; Appealable Orders. An order overruling a motion to vacate an order of publication against a nonresident defendant is not appealable, nor is a decree pro confessO against such a defendant for failure to answer, as neither is a final decree disposing of the case, nor such an interlocutory order as is appealable to this court- under § 226, Code, D. C.