Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1909

156 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1909.

  • Baum v. WM. Knabe & Co. Manufacturing Co. 33 App. D.C. 237, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Consaul v. Cummings 33 App. D.C. 132, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • American Federation of Labor v. Buck's Stove & Range Co. 33 App. D.C. 83, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Hall v. District of Columbia 33 App. D.C. 80, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Peters v. Pike 33 App. D.C. 59, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Rondinella v. Southern Railway Co. 33 App. D.C. 65, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Stubblefield v. Stubblefield 32 App. D.C. 535, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Babson v. Cox 32 App. D.C. 542, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • City & Suburban Railway v. Cooper 32 App. D.C. 550, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Macfarland v. Poulos 32 App. D.C. 558, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • In re Herbst 32 App. D.C. 565, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Dumas v. Clayton 32 App. D.C. 566, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • General Railway Signal Co. v. Thullen 32 App. D.C. 575, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Rolfe v. Kaisling 32 App. D.C. 582, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Rolfe v. Leeper 32 App. D.C. 589, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • In re New South Brewery & Ice Co. 32 App. D.C. 591, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Marder v. Dey 32 App. D.C. 593, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • In re Luten 32 App. D.C. 599, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Peirce v. Hiss 33 App. D.C. 1, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Johnson & Johnson v. Whelan 33 App. D.C. 4, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Lenman v. Jones 33 App. D.C. 7, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Wade v. United States 33 App. D.C. 29, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Schickler v. Washington Brewery Co. 33 App. D.C. 35, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Van Fleet v. King 33 App. D.C. 47, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Moulton v. Cornish 32 App. D.C. 533, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Wainwright v. Parker 32 App. D.C. 431, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Metzler v. Harry Kaufman Co. 32 App. D.C. 434, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Washington, Alexandria, & Mt. Vernon Railway Co. v. Lukens 32 App. D.C. 442, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • National Safe Deposit, Savings, & Trust Co. v. Hibbs 32 App. D.C. 459, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Pickford v. Hudson 32 App. D.C. 480, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Crook v. International Trust Co. 32 App. D.C. 490, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Macfarland v. Bieber 32 App. D.C. 513, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • In re Central Consumers Co. 32 App. D.C. 523, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • United States v. Daly 32 App. D.C. 525, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Hannis Distilling Co. v. George W. Torrey Co. 32 App. D.C. 530, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Churchill v. Goodwin 32 App. D.C. 428, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Nelson v. Felsing 32 App. D.C. 420, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Catholic University of America v. Waggaman 32 App. D.C. 307, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • J. A. Scriven Co. v. W. H. Towles Manufacturing Co. 32 App. D.C. 321, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • J. A. Scriven Co. v. Ferguson McKinney Dry Goods Co. 32 App. D.C. 323, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Geltz v. Crozier 32 App. D.C. 324, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Neuberth v. Lizotte 32 App. D.C. 329, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • In re Blackmore 32 App. D.C. 338, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • In re Orcutt 32 App. D.C. 345, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Johnson v. Brandau 32 App. D.C. 348, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Charles Dennehy & Co. v. Robertson, Sanderson, & Co. 32 App. D.C. 355, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • In re Berger 32 App. D.C. 358, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Sydeman v. Thoma 32 App. D.C. 362, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • Conner v. Dean 32 App. D.C. 375, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
  • District of Columbia v. Brewer 32 App. D.C. 388, (D.C. Cir. 1909)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑