U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1910

Capital Traction Co. v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 5, 1910 · Orsdel

34 App. D.C. 591; 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5855

Counsel

Mr. R. Ross Perry, Mr. R. Ross Perry, Jr., and Mr. G. Thomas Dunlop for the plaintiff in error., Mr. Daniel W. Balcer, United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, and Mr. F. Sprigg Perry, Assistant, for the defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Cefaratti (D.C. Cir. 1953)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Yan Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case was brought here by the Capital Traction Company *592on a writ of error to the police court of the District of Colum-; bia to review an order denying a motion to quash an,information charging the appellant company with unlawfully operating a street railway car within the District of Columbia, “equipped with wheels causing unnecessary noise and unevenness in operation, commonly known as flat wheels.”. No final judgment was entered in this case. The order appealed from is a mere interlocutory order denying a motion to quash a criminal information. The case has not been dismissed in the court below, but stands ready for the plea of the defendant company and for trial. By a uniform line of decision, this court has held that an appeal will not lie from an order such as the one before us. The question here presented is purely a moot one, and the court will not stop to review it. The writ is dismissed, and it is so ordered. Dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.