Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1912

178 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1912.

  • Velati v. Dante 39 App. D.C. 372, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States v. Von Jenny 39 App. D.C. 377, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Rudolph v. Sensener 39 App. D.C. 385, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • District of Columbia v. Gardiner 39 App. D.C. 389, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Burch 39 App. D.C. 397, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • French v. Association for Works of Mercy 39 App. D.C. 406, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re French 39 App. D.C. 413, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Browne v. Dyson 39 App. D.C. 415, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Western Electric Co. 39 App. D.C. 420, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Boston Wine & Spirits Co. 39 App. D.C. 421, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Cake 39 App. D.C. 425, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Henderson v. Gilpin 39 App. D.C. 428, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Mygatt 39 App. D.C. 432, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Eshleman v. Shantz 39 App. D.C. 434, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Reisch Brewing Co. 39 App. D.C. 445, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Perlman 39 App. D.C. 447, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Bliss 39 App. D.C. 453, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Griffith 39 App. D.C. 456, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Leonard v. Pardee 39 App. D.C. 458, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Perri v. Thoma 39 App. D.C. 460, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • In re Havens 39 App. D.C. 465, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Tribby v. O'Neal 39 App. D.C. 467, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States ex rel. Moser v. Myer 39 App. D.C. 370, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Chicago Film Exchange v. Motion Picture Patents Co. 39 App. D.C. 285, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. Cullember 39 App. D.C. 316, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Eureka Life Insurance v. Hawkins 39 App. D.C. 329, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • District of Columbia v. Witmer 39 App. D.C. 334, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Miller v. Travers 39 App. D.C. 340, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Nicolopole v. Love 39 App. D.C. 343, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Munsey v. Shoomaker Co. 39 App. D.C. 353, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Bankers Surety Co. v. Security Trust Co. 39 App. D.C. 354, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Rinehart v. Gibson 39 App. D.C. 358, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Re Eagle Pencil Co. 39 App. D.C. 361, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Murphy v. Gould 39 App. D.C. 363, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Ross v. Washington Railway & Electric Co. 39 App. D.C. 591, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Richards v. Geiger 39 App. D.C. 278, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Diggs v. Thurston 39 App. D.C. 267, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Oppenheimer v. Philadelphia, Baltimore, & Washington Railroad 39 App. D.C. 253, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States ex rel. Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher 39 App. D.C. 158, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Plant v. Donaldson 39 App. D.C. 162, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Bowen v. Howenstein 39 App. D.C. 167, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Hagerty v. Olmstead 39 App. D.C. 170, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States ex rel. McManus v. Fisher 39 App. D.C. 176, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • United States ex rel. Red River Lumber Co. v. Fisher 39 App. D.C. 181, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Parish v. McGowan 39 App. D.C. 184, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Wilson 39 App. D.C. 211, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Fowler v. Cotton State Lumber Co. 39 App. D.C. 220, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • American Security & Trust Co. v. Kaveney 39 App. D.C. 223, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Rudolph v. Golden & Co. 39 App. D.C. 230, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
  • Philip Carey Co. v. Thyson 39 App. D.C. 233, (D.C. Cir. 1912)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑