Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1913

143 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1913.

  • Evans v. Shinn 40 App. D.C. 557, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Metzger v. Washington Post Co. 40 App. D.C. 565, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Hubbard v. Berg 40 App. D.C. 577, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Re Ferres 40 App. D.C. 584, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Talty v. Talty 40 App. D.C. 587, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Moore v. United States ex rel. Chott 40 App. D.C. 591, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • First National Bank v. Fox 40 App. D.C. 430, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Edwards v. Fox 40 App. D.C. 439, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Sabens v. United States 40 App. D.C. 440, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Anderson v. Sands 40 App. D.C. 447, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Gonzales v. United States 40 App. D.C. 450, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Southern Building Corp. 40 App. D.C. 459, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. McLean 40 App. D.C. 465, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Bride v. Reeves 40 App. D.C. 473, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Re Excelsior Shoe Co. 40 App. D.C. 480, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Bower v. Gray 40 App. D.C. 483, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Re Motz Tire & Rubber Co. 40 App. D.C. 487, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Fleming v. Capital Traction Co. 40 App. D.C. 489, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • O'Brien v. Lane 40 App. D.C. 493, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Whitney v. Groo 40 App. D.C. 496, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • District of Columbia v. Simpson 40 App. D.C. 498, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Green v. United States 40 App. D.C. 426, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Re Rowe 40 App. D.C. 423, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • United States Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co. 40 App. D.C. 239, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Re Gompers 40 App. D.C. 293, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Hurd v. Cramer 40 App. D.C. 349, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Howell v. Commercial National Bank 40 App. D.C. 370, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Milano v. United States 40 App. D.C. 379, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Jefferson v. District of Columbia 40 App. D.C. 381, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Warder v. Newburgh 40 App. D.C. 385, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Morrison v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. 40 App. D.C. 391, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • McNeil v. Gary 40 App. D.C. 397, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • MacPherson v. Harding 40 App. D.C. 404, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Codington v. Standard Bank of Canada 40 App. D.C. 409, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Washington, Alexandria, & Mount Vernon Railway Co. v. Fincham 40 App. D.C. 412, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Lockwood v. Rucker 40 App. D.C. 422, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Hayes v. Huddleson 40 App. D.C. 183, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Great Falls & Old Dominion Railroad v. Hammerly 40 App. D.C. 196, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Rankin v. Collins 40 App. D.C. 211, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Mays v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 40 App. D.C. 249, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Phillips v. United States 40 App. D.C. 260, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Hutchins v. Dante 40 App. D.C. 262, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Shaver v. Newdick 40 App. D.C. 273, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Herz v. Loewenstein 40 App. D.C. 277, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Re Taylor 40 App. D.C. 279, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Eastwood v. Rowell 40 App. D.C. 280, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Consumers Co. v. Hydrox Chemical Co. 40 App. D.C. 284, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Hewlett v. Steinberger 40 App. D.C. 287, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Hutchins v. Hutchins 40 App. D.C. 180, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Re Moulton 40 App. D.C. 160, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑