Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1913

143 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1913.

  • Jameson v. Ellsworth 40 App. D.C. 164, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Jameson v. Ellsworth 40 App. D.C. 168, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad 40 App. D.C. 169, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Washington Railway Co. v. Downey 40 App. D.C. 147, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Bunch v. United States ex rel. Keppler 40 App. D.C. 156, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Parish v. Craig 40 App. D.C. 138, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Weeks v. Heurich 40 App. D.C. 46, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Noble v. Crane 40 App. D.C. 64, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • McKenzie v. Fisher 40 App. D.C. 74, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Boynton v. Taggart 40 App. D.C. 82, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Dade v. United States 40 App. D.C. 94, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Tyler v. Andrews 40 App. D.C. 100, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Driver v. Brunemer 40 App. D.C. 105, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Oliver Chilled Plow Works v. Wm. J. Oliver Manufacturing Co. 40 App. D.C. 125, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Lynchburg Investment Corp. v. Rudolph 40 App. D.C. 129, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Lamson v. Andrews 40 App. D.C. 39, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Hutchins v. Dante 40 App. D.C. 43, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • United States ex rel. Southwick v. Fisher 39 App. D.C. 545, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Grabowsky v. Gallaher 39 App. D.C. 548, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Benners v. Richards 39 App. D.C. 553, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Re Harbeck 39 App. D.C. 555, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. District of Columbia 39 App. D.C. 565, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Bowen v. Howenstein 39 App. D.C. 585, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Bray v. United States 39 App. D.C. 600, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Wendell v. Holland America Line 40 App. D.C. 1, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Royal Glue Co. v. Lange 40 App. D.C. 9, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Whitford v. United States 40 App. D.C. 14, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Miehle v. Scott 40 App. D.C. 17, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Leonard v. Horton 40 App. D.C. 22, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • In re Higgins 40 App. D.C. 29, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • In re Mygatt 40 App. D.C. 32, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Joseph Lay Co. v. Indianapolis Brush & Broom Manufacturing Co. 40 App. D.C. 36, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Anderson v. Sands 39 App. D.C. 533, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Galt v. United States 39 App. D.C. 470, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • First National Bank v. Fox 39 App. D.C. 477, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Edwards v. Fox 39 App. D.C. 482, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Hump Hairpin Co. v. De Long Hook & Eye Co. 39 App. D.C. 484, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • In re Standard Oil Co. 39 App. D.C. 491, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Dunkley v. Beekhuis 39 App. D.C. 494, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • New Departure Manufacturing Co. v. Robinson 39 App. D.C. 504, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • G & J Tire Co. v. G. J. G. Motor Car Co. 39 App. D.C. 508, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Dante v. Bagby 39 App. D.C. 516, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
  • Kincheloe v. Murray 39 App. D.C. 519, (D.C. Cir. 1913)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑