Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1914

52 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1914.

  • Baglin v. Southern Surety Co. 41 App. D.C. 530, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Kemp v. United States 41 App. D.C. 539, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Lyon v. Russell 41 App. D.C. 554, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Brenizer v. Robinson 41 App. D.C. 560, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Lorimer v. Keith 41 App. D.C. 562, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Warrington v. Combs 41 App. D.C. 568, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Barber v. Spalckhaver 41 App. D.C. 576, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Bettendorf v. McKeen 41 App. D.C. 580, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Sutton v. Wentworth 41 App. D.C. 582, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Re Pein 41 App. D.C. 586, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Stamatopoulos v. Stephano Bros. 41 App. D.C. 590, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Hibbs v. Beall 41 App. D.C. 592, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Flaherty v. Columbus 41 App. D.C. 525, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Ashford v. Evening Star Newspaper Co. 41 App. D.C. 395, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Reagan v. District of Columbia 41 App. D.C. 409, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Karrick v. Landon 41 App. D.C. 416, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Palmer v. King 41 App. D.C. 419, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Comptograph Co. v. Adder Machine Co. 41 App. D.C. 427, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. Newman 41 App. D.C. 439, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Newman v. Blake & Knowles Steam Pump Works 41 App. D.C. 449, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Huyler's v. Houston 41 App. D.C. 452, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Nash v. Rawlett 41 App. D.C. 456, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • District of Columbia v. Tyrrell 41 App. D.C. 463, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Cissel, Talbot, & Co. v. Hayden 41 App. D.C. 477, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Emerson v. Riley 41 App. D.C. 480, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Riley v. Emerson 41 App. D.C. 497, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Brown v. Campbell 41 App. D.C. 499, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Johnson v. Martin 41 App. D.C. 502, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • E. A. Bromund Co. v. Columbia Wax Products Co. 41 App. D.C. 506, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Asbestone Co. v. Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. 41 App. D.C. 507, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Peter Schoenhofen Brewing Co. v. John Sexton & Co. 41 App. D.C. 510, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Re Cooper 41 App. D.C. 511, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Re Barrett Manufacturing Co. 41 App. D.C. 513, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • N. Wolf & Sons v. Lord & Taylor 41 App. D.C. 514, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Re McNeil 41 App. D.C. 516, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Re Ochs 41 App. D.C. 519, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Re Fleuss 41 App. D.C. 520, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Shipley v. Shamwell 41 App. D.C. 267, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • O'Toole v. Lamson 41 App. D.C. 276, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Roth v. Mercantile Bank 41 App. D.C. 293, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • In re Merrill 41 App. D.C. 294, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • In re Capron 41 App. D.C. 299, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Hopkins v. Peters 41 App. D.C. 302, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • In re Groves 41 App. D.C. 316, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Keetoowah Society v. Lane 41 App. D.C. 319, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Hamilton v. United States 41 App. D.C. 359, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Merillat v. Hooker 41 App. D.C. 364, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Hutchins v. Hutchins 41 App. D.C. 367, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Morse v. United States 41 App. D.C. 374, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
  • Walker v. McIntire 41 App. D.C. 380, (D.C. Cir. 1914)
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑