Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1914

52 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1914.

  • Baglin v. Southern Surety Co. Mar 2, 1914 No. 2591 41 App. D.C. 530; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2216
  • Barber v. Spalckhaver Mar 2, 1914 No. 889 41 App. D.C. 576; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2223
  • Bettendorf v. McKeen Mar 2, 1914 No. 890 41 App. D.C. 580; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2224
  • Brenizer v. Robinson Mar 2, 1914 No. 854 41 App. D.C. 560; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2220
  • Hibbs v. Beall Mar 2, 1914 No. 2597 41 App. D.C. 592; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2228
  • Kemp v. United States Mar 2, 1914 No. 2593 41 App. D.C. 539; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2217
  • Lorimer v. Keith Mar 2, 1914 Nos. 874, 877 and 878 41 App. D.C. 562; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2221
  • Lyon v. Russell Mar 2, 1914 No. 2598 41 App. D.C. 554; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2219
  • Re Pein Mar 2, 1914 No. 896 41 App. D.C. 586; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2226
  • Stamatopoulos v. Stephano Bros. Mar 2, 1914 No. 899 41 App. D.C. 590; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2227
  • Sutton v. Wentworth Mar 2, 1914 No. 892 41 App. D.C. 582; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2225
  • Warrington v. Combs Mar 2, 1914 Nos. 880, 881, and 882 41 App. D.C. 568; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2222
  • Flaherty v. Columbus Feb 5, 1914 No. 2589 41 App. D.C. 525; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2215
  • Asbestone Co. v. Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. Feb 2, 1914 No. 885 41 App. D.C. 507; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2207
  • Ashford v. Evening Star Newspaper Co. Feb 2, 1914 Nos. 2504, 2505, 2506 41 App. D.C. 395; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2191
  • Brown v. Campbell Feb 2, 1914 No. 876 41 App. D.C. 499; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2204
  • Cissel, Talbot, & Co. v. Hayden Feb 2, 1914 No. 2602 41 App. D.C. 477; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2201
  • Comptograph Co. v. Adder Machine Co. Feb 2, 1914 No. 2583 41 App. D.C. 427; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2195
  • District of Columbia v. Tyrrell Feb 2, 1914 No. 2600 41 App. D.C. 463; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2200
  • E. A. Bromund Co. v. Columbia Wax Products Co. Feb 2, 1914 No. 884 41 App. D.C. 506; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2206
  • Emerson v. Riley Feb 2, 1914 No. 863 41 App. D.C. 480; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2202
  • Huyler's v. Houston Feb 2, 1914 No. 2595 41 App. D.C. 452; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2198
  • Johnson v. Martin Feb 2, 1914 No. 879 41 App. D.C. 502; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2205
  • Karrick v. Landon Feb 2, 1914 No. 2555 41 App. D.C. 416; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2193
  • N. Wolf & Sons v. Lord & Taylor Feb 2, 1914 No. 895 41 App. D.C. 514; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2211
  • Nash v. Rawlett Feb 2, 1914 No. 2596 41 App. D.C. 456; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2199
  • Newman v. Blake & Knowles Steam Pump Works Feb 2, 1914 No. 2594 41 App. D.C. 449; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2197
  • Palmer v. King Feb 2, 1914 No. 2576 41 App. D.C. 419; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2194
  • Peter Schoenhofen Brewing Co. v. John Sexton & Co. Feb 2, 1914 No. 886 41 App. D.C. 510; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2208
  • Re Barrett Manufacturing Co. Feb 2, 1914 No. 894 41 App. D.C. 513; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2210
  • Re Cooper Feb 2, 1914 No. 891 41 App. D.C. 511; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2209
  • Re Fleuss Feb 2, 1914 No. 901 41 App. D.C. 520; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2214
  • Re McNeil Feb 2, 1914 No. 898 41 App. D.C. 516; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2212
  • Re Ochs Feb 2, 1914 No. 888 41 App. D.C. 519; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2213
  • Reagan v. District of Columbia Feb 2, 1914 No. 2573 41 App. D.C. 409; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2192
  • Riley v. Emerson Feb 2, 1914 No. 866 41 App. D.C. 497; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2203
  • Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. Newman Feb 2, 1914 No. 2585 41 App. D.C. 439; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2196
  • Hamilton v. United States Jan 5, 1914 No. 2586 41 App. D.C. 359; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2184
  • Hopkins v. Peters Jan 5, 1914 Nos. 869, 871, 872 41 App. D.C. 302; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2178
  • Hutchins v. Hutchins Jan 5, 1914 No. 2612 41 App. D.C. 367; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2186
  • In re Capron Jan 5, 1914 No. 856 41 App. D.C. 299; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2177
  • In re Groves Jan 5, 1914 No. 875 41 App. D.C. 316; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2179
  • In re Merrill Jan 5, 1914 No. 791 41 App. D.C. 294; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2176
  • Keetoowah Society v. Lane Jan 5, 1914 No. 2538 41 App. D.C. 319; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2180
  • McMillan v. Fuller Jan 5, 1914 No. 2582 41 App. D.C. 384; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2189
  • Merillat v. Hooker Jan 5, 1914 No. 2579 41 App. D.C. 364; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2185
  • Morse v. United States Jan 5, 1914 No. 2578 41 App. D.C. 374; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2187
  • O'Toole v. Lamson Jan 5, 1914 No. 2568 41 App. D.C. 276; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2174
  • Roth v. Mercantile Bank Jan 5, 1914 No. 2569 41 App. D.C. 293; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2175
  • Shipley v. Shamwell Jan 5, 1914 No. 2557 41 App. D.C. 267; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2173
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑