In re Meyer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
In re Meyer, 48 App. D.C. 580 (D.C. Cir. 1919)
1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2357
In re Meyer
Opinion of the Court
The application [by Albert T. Meyer] for patent here in issue relates to a composition for furnace lining ■capable of withstanding a high degree of heat without being chemically affected in the reduction of ores.
The three tribunals below were unanimous in holding that ■the invention is anticipated by a patent issued to applicant in ■1915; hence, to allow the claims of the present application Would amount to double patenting.
The ruling is clearly supported by the record, and the de
Affirmed.
A motion for rehearing was denied May 22, 1919.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- IN RE MEYER
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Patents; Double Patenting. A decision of the Commissioner of Patents rejecting the claims of an application for a patent for a composition for furnace lining was affirmed in view of a prior patent issued to applicant.