Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1922

137 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1922.

  • Freeman v. W. B. Moses & Sons, Inc. 285 F. 898, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • George v. Thompson 285 F. 902, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Morgan v. Kraft 285 F. 906, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Robertson v. United States ex rel. Baff 285 F. 911, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • O'Brien v. McCarthy 285 F. 917, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. Mattingly 285 F. 922, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Stern v. Drew 285 F. 925, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Eichberg v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. 285 F. 928, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Eisinger v. E. J. Murphy Co. 285 F. 931, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Snider v. Lyons 285 F. 932, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • International Exch. Bank v. Pullo 285 F. 933, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Children's Hospital of District of Columbia v. Adkins 284 F. 613, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Waters v. Taylor 284 F. 639, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Simpson v. Stein 284 F. 731, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Cohen v. Fall 284 F. 734, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Brosnan v. Fox 284 F. 923, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Herald v. United States 284 F. 927, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Whitaker v. Hitt 285 F. 797, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • United States ex rel. Durnford v. Fall 285 F. 887, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Fall v. United States ex rel. Lynn 285 F. 889, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Fletcher v. Coomes 285 F. 893, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Carson v. Jackson 281 F. 411, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Ruedy v. Twigg 281 F. 418, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Bungay v. Grey 281 F. 423, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • In re Schroeder 281 F. 427, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Paris v. Burke 281 F. 429, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Anderson v. Symons 281 F. 430, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • In re Power 281 F. 431, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • In re Power 281 F. 432, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • George v. Forest Glen Land Co. 281 F. 577, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Lavagnino v. Prall 281 F. 581, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Prall v. Harper 281 F. 585, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Automatic Electric Co. v. Dyson 281 F. 586, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Sands v. McNeill 281 F. 589, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Chessin v. Klahn 281 F. 592, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Leonard v. Everett 281 F. 594, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Heurich v. Sullivan 281 F. 599, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Harlan v. Harlan 281 F. 602, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Peake v. N. L. Sansbury Co. 281 F. 604, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Scott v. Longtin 281 F. 606, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Application of Toledo Scale Co. 281 F. 607, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Hyman v. Rudolph 281 F. 1017, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • In re Plumly 281 F. 1018, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • McReynolds v. W. F. Roberts Co. 281 F. 286, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Dingman v. Henry 279 F. 795, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Maryland Casualty Co. v. John H. Parker Co. 279 F. 796, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Stein v. Dosch 279 F. 799, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • McGrew v. McGrew 279 F. 923, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • In re Nathan 279 F. 925, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
  • Phillips v. Moore & Hill, Inc. 279 F. 927, (D.C. Cir. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑