U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1922

Convery v. Brucker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 6, 1922 · No. 1430 · Appeal, Determination, Hearing, Hitz, Orsdel, Place, Robb, Supreme

278 F. 1019; 51 App. D.C. 306; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2762

Counsel

Robert F. Rogers and Edmund H. Parry, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant., William F. Hall, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal fi-om concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in an interference proceeding in which priority was awarded the senior party, Brucker, whose filing date was prior to appellant’s earliest claimed date of reduction to practice.

The tribunals below having fully and satisfactorily disposed of every contention made by appellant, we affirm the decision appealed from, without further discussion.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice HITZ, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat in the place of Mr. Justice VAN ORSDEL in the hearing and determination of this appeal.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.