Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1923

148 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1923.

  • United Electric Co. v. Replogle 289 F. 626, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Howerton v. District of Columbia 289 F. 628, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Marshalltown Laboratories v. Brady 289 F. 630, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Merritt v. Thompson 289 F. 631, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Marsh Capron Mfg. Co. v. Bates Machine & Tractor Co. 289 F. 633, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Chapman v. Hammett 289 F. 634, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Sterling v. United States 289 F. 635, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • In re Peters 289 F. 637, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Luber v. Beach 289 F. 638, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Waldes & Co. v. Raden Bros. 289 F. 639, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Lindberg v. Humphrey 289 F. 901, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Ziang Sun Wan v. United States 289 F. 908, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Lewis v. American Security & Trust Co. 289 F. 916, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Banco Mexicano De Commercio E Industria v. Deutsche Bank 289 F. 924, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Green v. Pyne 289 F. 929, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Harting v. Harting 289 F. 937, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Briggs v. Kaisling 288 F. 254, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Smith v. United States 288 F. 259, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Diggs v. Diggs 288 F. 262, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Merchants' Bank v. National Capital Press, Inc. 288 F. 265, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Kremer v. Harsel 288 F. 267, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Price v. Moyer 288 F. 269, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • In re Ruths 288 F. 270, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Huntt v. Brightwood Sanitarium Co. 288 F. 272, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Washington & O. D. Ry. Co. v. Dulany 288 F. 421, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Wright v. United States 288 F. 428, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Miller v. United States ex rel. New Process Metals Co. 288 F. 434, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Whalen Paper & Pulp Mills, Ltd. v. Davis 288 F. 438, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Fuller v. United States 288 F. 442, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Dick v. Davis 288 F. 445, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Robinson v. United States 288 F. 450, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • In re Talley 288 F. 453, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Standerwick v. Kane 288 F. 455, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Swartwout v. Skinner 288 F. 458, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Metzger v. O'Donoghue 288 F. 461, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • In re Sheffield 288 F. 463, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • United States ex rel. Chicago, New York & Boston Refrigerator Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission 288 F. 649, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Eichelberger v. Symons 288 F. 654, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Murray v. United States 288 F. 1008, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • No-Leak-O Piston Ring Co. v. Chandlee 289 F. 526, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Brown v. Sellers 292 F. 655, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Brown v. Sellers 292 F. 655, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Frothingham v. Mellon 288 F. 252, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Egan v. United States 287 F. 958, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Kennedy Bros. v. Sinclair 287 F. 972, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Thompson v. Tanner 287 F. 980, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Campbell v. Helm 287 F. 985, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Cave v. Rudolph 287 F. 989, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Reilly v. Cullinane 287 F. 994, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
  • Fall v. State 287 F. 999, (D.C. Cir. 1923)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑