Hoover v. Kirby
Opinion of the Court
This interference involves substantially the same question determined in the preceding interference, No. 1711, 4 F.(2d) 287, just decided, and was so considered by the Patent Office. For the reasons stated in the other decision, we affirm the decision here.
Affirmed.
Petition for rehearing denied February 21,1925.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Howard Earl HOOVER v. James B. KIRBY and Daniel B. REPLOGLE
- Status
- Published