U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1925

In re Carrier

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 6, 1925 · Ded, Martin, Ors, Ouriam, Robb

4 F.2d 1013; 55 App. D.C. 400; 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3161 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

A. E. Parsons, of Syracuse, N. Y., for appellant. T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. 0., for Commissioner of Patents.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re Muskat (Court of Customs and Patent Appeals 1951)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER OURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office refusing to allow claims 1 to 8, inclusive, 15, 16, 17, 19; and 20, of appellant’s application for a patent relating to a humidity regulator. After a careful examination of the record and briefs, and giving due consideration to the argument at bar, we are convinced, as were the tribunals of the Patent Office, that the allowance by the office of seven claims of the application protected all the novel features of appellant’s device. For the reasons stated by the Patent Office, we affirm the decision.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.