Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit /

1925

188 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit opinions from 1925.

  • Jaeger v. O'Donoghue 6 F.2d 686, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Work v. United States ex rel. Davis 6 F.2d 690, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • United States ex rel. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission 6 F.2d 692, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • United States ex rel. Besaw v. Work 6 F.2d 694, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • In re Henry 6 F.2d 699, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Torrey v. Wolfes 6 F.2d 702, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Langmuir v. Arnold 6 F.2d 704, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Lindsey v. Bergner 6 F.2d 705, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Masury v. Bell 6 F.2d 708, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Masury v. Bell 6 F.2d 709, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • District of Columbia v. Berberich 6 F.2d 710, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Medes v. Hornbach 6 F.2d 711, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Chaloner v. Washington Post Co. 6 F.2d 712, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Johnston v. Davis 6 F.2d 713, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • United States ex rel. Troy Laundry Machinery Co. v. Robertson 6 F.2d 714, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Whaley v. Norment 6 F.2d 716, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Continental Varnish Co. v. Alabastine Co. 6 F.2d 717, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • In re Pitney-Bowes Postage Meter Co. 6 F.2d 717, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Carley v. Matthes 6 F.2d 718, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Saunders v. Campbell 6 F.2d 719, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Mann v. Legler 6 F.2d 719, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • In re J. L. Hudson Co. 6 F.2d 720, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • In re Stoffregen 6 F.2d 943, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Bramhall v. Brosnan 5 F.2d 270, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • District of Columbia v. Totten 5 F.2d 374, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Wright v. Wardman 5 F.2d 380, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Claudy v. Duvall 5 F.2d 381, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Lyman v. Knickerbocker Theatre Co. of Washington 5 F.2d 538, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Washington Times Co. v. Hines 5 F.2d 541, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Trice v. Trice 5 F.2d 543, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Faunce v. Woods 5 F.2d 753, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Hubbard v. Mellon 5 F.2d 764, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Lee v. Lee 5 F.2d 767, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Oregon Basin Oil & Gas Co. v. Work 6 F.2d 676, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • McDonald v. Maxwell 6 F.2d 678, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Ostermoor & Co. v. Rose Spring & Mattress Co. 5 F.2d 268, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Paratino v. Gildenhorn 4 F.2d 938, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Crane v. Thompson 4 F.2d 940, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Snead & Co. Iron Works v. Behn 4 F.2d 942, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Macaulay v. Malt-Diastase Co. 4 F.2d 944, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Melling v. Gordon 4 F.2d 945, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • District of Columbia v. Bauer 4 F.2d 947, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Myers v. Myers 4 F.2d 948, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Caffrey v. Caffrey 4 F.2d 952, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Tupelo Cotton Mills v. American Bleached Goods Co. 4 F.2d 953, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Jones v. Midgley 4 F.2d 954, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • B. Heller & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co. 4 F.2d 955, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Lee v. Vreeland 4 F.2d 956, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • Mannion v. Penn 4 F.2d 957, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
  • In re Drew 4 F.2d 958, (D.C. Cir. 1925)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑