Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1926

De Forest v. Hartley

De Forest v. Hartley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 4, 1926 · No. 1767 · Customs, Martin, Robb, Smith
10 F.2d 903; 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2290; 56 App. D.C. 108 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

S. E. Darby and S. E. Darby, Jr., both of New York City, and C. M. Thomas and F. D. Thomas, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant., I. J. Adams, F. T. Woodward, G-. W. Rich, and J. W. Sehmied, all of New York City, for appellee.

De Forest v. Hartley

Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

In this appeal the proofs are the same as in appeals Nos. 1761 and 1762, 10 F.(2d) 901. For the reasons stated in our opinion in those two cases, the decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.