Varela v. Bell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Varela v. Bell, 10 F.2d 989 (D.C. Cir. 1926)
56 App. D.C. 124; 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2315
Martin, Orsdel, Robb

Varela v. Bell

Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, by way of intervention, filed a bill for injunction, praying the same relief as that sought by the plaintiffs in the case of Larrabee et al. v. Bell et al., 10 F.(2d) 986, — App. D. C. —, No. 4270, this day decided. For the reasons expressed in the opinion therein, the decree in this case is affirmed, with costs.

Reference

Full Case Name
Edmund A. VARELA (Carrie B. WALSH, Intervener) v. J. Franklin BELL, Cuno H. Rudolph, and James F. Oyster, as Commissioners of the District of Columbia and as Members of the Zoning Commission
Status
Published