Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1926

Varela v. Bell

Varela v. Bell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 4, 1926 · Martin, Orsdel, Robb
10 F.2d 989; 56 App. D.C. 124; 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2315 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

W. J. Lambert and R. H. Yeatman, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants., R. G. Donaldson, Hayden Johnson, Y. E. West, C. L. Frailey, F. H. Stephens, and J. C. Wilkes, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees. ■

Varela v. Bell

Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, by way of intervention, filed a bill for injunction, praying the same relief as that sought by the plaintiffs in the case of Larrabee et al. v. Bell et al., 10 F.(2d) 986, — App. D. C. —, No. 4270, this day decided. For the reasons expressed in the opinion therein, the decree in this case is affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.