U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1926

Snyder v. Hunter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 10, 1926 · Robb

11 F.2d 336; 56 App. D.C. 164; 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2485 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Peyton Gordon and J. H. Burnett, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants., J. A. O’Shea, J. S. Detwiler, A. L. Newmeyer, M. W. King, and William Wendell, all of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Fireison v. Pearson (D.C. 1987)
Driscoll's, Inc. v. California Berry Cultivars, LLC (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Motion by the United States to reeall the mandate heretofore issued, that it may be amended; the ground of the motion being that there exists a misapprehension as to its scope.

The habeas corpus petition was accompanied by a petition for certiorari to the commissioner. By stipulation the stenographic record of the hearing before the commissioner was made a part of his return to the writ of certiorari. By further stipulation the case came before the lower court on both the petition for habeas corpus and for warrants of removal. That hearing was upon the record made before the commissioner, no further evidence having been offered by either side. The lower court disagreed with the commissioner. We agreed with the commissioner and reversed the judgment. Obviously, all that remained to be done was the issuance of the removal warrants.

In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to reeall the mandate, as to which there Can be no further question. Wilson v. Newburgh, 43 App. D. C. 202. The motion is therefore denied.

Denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.