U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1926

In re McKesson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 5, 1926

11 F.2d 999; 56 App. D.C. 401; 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

G. E. Kirk, o£ Toledo, Ohio, for appellant., T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Kinnear v. Marzall (District Court, District of Columbia 1951)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing claims Nos. 43 to 49, inclusive, in appellant’s reissue application, because they do not properly read upon his disclosure, and because he is estopped to make them in a reissue application, he having canceled from his original application claims of substantially the same scope.

We have carefully examined the record and brief of appellant, in the light of his oral argument, and are content to rest our opinion upon the decisions of the Patent Office. The decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.