Leapley v. Matthews
Leapley v. Matthews
50 F.2d 1016; 60 App. D.C. 251; 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 4633
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Leapley v. Matthews
Opinion of the Court
The only error assigned to which exception was taken in the court below is the third: “The Court erred in overruling the plaintiff’s motion for new trial, because the finding of fact is contrary to the evidence, the weight of the evidence and the law.”
“According to federal practice this is not assignable as error.” Whelan v. Welch, 50 App. D. C. 174, 269 F. 689, 690, and eases cited; Preleau v. U. S., 50 App. D. C. 287, 271 F. 361; Hill v. U. S., 22 App. D. C. 396.
The judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.