U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1931

Reichelderfer v. Quinn

Reichelderfer v. Quinn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided December 7, 1931
53 F.2d 1079; 60 App. D.C. 325; 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2822 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

William W. Bride and Robert E. Lynch, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants-., Henry I. Quinn and George E. Sullivan, both of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Reichelderfer v. Quinn

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It is agreed by counsel that the issue presented in this appeal and also the parties involved are identical with those appearing in Quinn et al. v. Dougherty et al., Commissioners of the District of Columbia, decided by this court January 7, 3929, 58 App. D. C. 339, 30 F.(2d) 749. It is only necessary now to say that, consistently with onr decision in tho former case, we affirm the decree of the lower court herein appealed from.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.