In the year 1930 there were four radio broadcasting stations located in the state of New Jersey which were sharing time upon the frequency of 1,450 kc., each having a power, of 250 watts. These were station WNJ owned and operated by the Radio Investment Company, located at Newark, N. J., station WHOM at Jersey City owned and operated by New Jersey Broadcasting Corporation, station WKBO located at Jersey City, and station WBMS located at Hackensack, N. J.

In that year station WNJ applied for a renewal of its license and requested a modification thereof for the use of 500-watt power and for unlimited hours of operation. This application accordingly impliedly requested the grant to WNJ of full-time operation upon frequency 1,450 kc. to the exclusion of the other three stations which were then sharing time with it upon that frequency-

On December 17, 1930, this application was heard before the examiner assigned by the commission, all of the stations being represented at the hearing, and testimony was duly taken. The examiner thereupon filed a report, in which he stated that in the summer of 1930 station WNJ had deviated from its ássigned frequency beyond the 500-cycle tolerance permitted by general order No. 7 on at least eight occasions; that the deviations were not due to causes beyond the control of the station; that the station had not been maintained in accordance with the progress of the radio art; that the technical operation of the station had not been carried on in accordance with the best accepted engineering standards; that on at least three occasions the station had failed properly to announce the playing of phonograph records in accordance with the provisions of general order No. 78; that the granting of the application of the station for increase in power would result in serious interference with existing stations to the detriment of those stations and the listening public; that the station had failed to make the maximum use of the facilities assigned to it; that it had failed to show that the service rendered by it was superior to that rendered by the stations with which it shared time; that the area served by it receives excellent service from numerous New York and New Jersey stations; but that while the station had been operated in a careless and negligent manner the examiner believed that its future operation would conform to the rules and regulations of the commission. The examiner therefore recommended that the license of the station should he renewed to share time with the other stations as theretofore allowed, and that its application for increased power and for a construction permit should be denied. Station WNJ excepted to the conclusions of the examiner denying its application for increased power and increased time, but on May 15, 1931, the commission issued its statement of facts and grounds for decision overruling the exceptions and granting the station a renewal of its license upon the terms recommended by the examiner.

*382In the meantime on December 6, T930, an application was filed, by station WHOM, one of the four stations sharing time as aforesaid, wherein the station similarly applied for unlimited time of operation. This application accordingly requested a transfer to station WHOM of the time theretofore granted to stations WNJ, WKBO, and WBMS. The application duly came on for hearing before an examiner on April 22, 1931, and the interested stations were represented at the hearing. The examiner after hearing the evidence reported that station WHOM had rendered an average local community service and was operated in accordance with modern engineering standards and in accordance with the regulations of the commission; that the operating company was financially and technically qualified and prepared to extend and improve its present service should increased hours of operation be permitted; that the programs broadcast by it were superior to those of stations WNJ and WKBO; that the licensee of station WNJ in the operation of that station had frequently been guilty of violating the 'terms of its license and of the commission’s regulations, and until recently had been operated with obsolete equipment and in a careless and negligent manner; that station WKBO was inadequately financed and rendered a comparatively poor program service; that the time division requirement between the stations involved in this ease was inexpedient because of the expense of operating an excessive number of broadcasting stations within the same location; that the division of time was a handicap to the stations not only financially but from an operating standpoint, and accordingly reduced the service to the listening public. The examiner stated it as his opinion that under the circumstances public interest, convenience, and necessity would be served by a consolidation of the assignments in a single progressive and well managed and adequately financed station such as station WHOM, to the exclusion of stations which .failed to meet standards of good broadcasting such as WNJ and WKBO. The examiner stated that the granting of the application of WHOM for increased hours of operation would result in an improvement in the public service and in a more efficient use of the frequency of 1,450 ke.; and in view of these findings the examiner reported that the public interest, convenience, and necessity would best be served by granting to station WHOM the time of operation theretofore assigned to stations WNJ and WKBO, and denying the application in so far as it related to the operation of station WBMS. The examiner accordingly recommended that a license be issued to station WHOM for the use of three-fourths time and to WBMS for one-fourth time upon the frequency of 1,450 ke.

This report was considered by the commission on October 23, 1931, and was approved, whereupon a modified license was issued to station WHOM authorizing the operation of that station on the frequency of 1,450 kc. with power output of 250 watts to operate three-fourths time and station WBMS to operate one-fourth time upon the same frequency and with the same power, and that the temporary broadcasting license theretofore issued to stations WNJ and WKBO should be terminated in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof. Station WNJ excepted to the rulings and orders of the commission and the present appeal is taken by it for a review of the same.

It is provided by law that such a review by.this court of the commission’s decisions shall be limited to questions of law and that findings of fact by the commission, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive unless it shall clearly appear that the findings of the commission are arbitrary or capricious. Radio Act 1927, § 16, as amended by Act July 1, 1930 (46 Stat. 844 [47 USCA § 96]).

■ We have reviewed the testimony and rulings contained in the record and are of the opinion that the decision of the commission is sustained by substantial evidence and is not capricious or arbitrary. It is manifest that the division of time upon the same frequency in the same locality between four local stations might be uneconomic and impractical. Necessarily such stations might depend upon the same local patronage for their support, and such a division of time might impose undue expense upon each station and such a division of the local patronage as would interfere with the efficient operation of the stations as required by the public interests. This statement is supported by the fact that station WNJ, supposedly for these reasons, requested the commission to give it full time of operation upon the frequency to the exclusion of the other three stations then sharing in it. In line with this procedure station WHOM later filed a similar request praying the commission to award it full time to the exclusion of stations WNJ, WBMS, and WKBO. In other words these two stations effectually brought before the commission the fact that it was in the public *383interest as well as to their own that the frequency in question should not be divided between them as had been the ease, but that one of them should be given full time to the exclusion of the other. After a full hearing of tho facts and circumstances involved in the case tho commission sustained this view and found that station WHOM should in the public interest be granted the exclusive use of the frequency in that locality.

It is unnecessary for us to discuss in detail the testimony contained in the reeord. We have examined it with care and find that the decision of the commission is supported by substantial evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious. Moreover wo find that the reeord discloses no error of procedure which deprived the appellant of a fair hearing in the case.

The decision appealed from is therefore affirmed.