U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1933

Burnet v. Whitcomb

Burnet v. Whitcomb
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 22, 1933 · Martin
65 F.2d 809; 62 App. D.C. 176; 12 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 886; 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3169 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

G. A. Youngquist, Sewall Key, C. M. Charest, and John D. Foley, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant., Claude R. Branch, of Boston, Mass., and W. W. Spalding, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Burnet v. Whitcomb

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The issues in this appeal are controlled by the same principles as those in Burnet v. Whitcomb, 62 App. D. C. 170, 65 F.(2d) 803, which is concurrently decided by us.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is accordingly reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

GRONER, Associate Justice, dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.