U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1940

Radtke v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 16, 1940

114 F.2d 15; 71 App. D.C. 375; 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 492; 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3057 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Leonard Day, of New York City, and A. K. Shipe, of Washington, D. C., for appellants Albert A. Radtke and Radtke Patents Corporation., Leslie C. Garnett and Samuel F. Beach, both of Washington, D. C., for appellees American Tri-Ergon Corporation and TriErgon Holding A. G., W. W. Cochran, U. S. Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., for appellee Conway P. Coe, Commissioner of Patents.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Switzer v. Marzall (District Court, District of Columbia 1951)
Shell Development Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co. (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1945)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause coming on to be heard on appellants’ motion filed on January 27, 1940, for temporary injunction to enjoin appellee Commissioner of Patents from issuing a patent as directed by the order of the District Court entered in this cause on January 24, 1940, and it appearing that said order of January 24, 1940, was entered by the District Court after an appeal to this court in the cause had been taken and perfected and after this court had obtained exclusive jurisdiction of the cause, see Lasier v. Lasier, 47 App.D.C. 80; Keyser v. Farr, 105 U.S. 265, 26 L.Ed. 1025, it is, therefore, ordered that, pending final determination of the appeal in this cause, or the further order of this court, said order of January 24, 1940, be, and it is hereby, stayed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.