U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1941

Donovan v. Brown

Donovan v. Brown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided December 10, 1941 · Edgerton, Groner, Miller
124 F.2d 295; 75 U.S. App. D.C. 93; 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2474 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. James J. Laughlin, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error., Mr. Vernon E. West, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, of Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Richmond B. Keech, Corp. Counsel, and Chester H. Gray, Asst. Corp. Counsel, both of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for defendants in error.

Donovan v. Brown

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal, appellant objects to the trial court’s charge to the jury, but the so-called bill of exceptions does not indicate that he did so at the trial. The objection comes too late. Martin v. Washington Times Co., 67 App.D.C. 11, 89 F.2d 230. It is a salutary rule that errors which the trial court is given no opportunity to correct will not, in general, be considered on appeal.

Affirmed.

GRONER, C. J., took no part in the consideration and decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.