Hill v. Capital Transit Co.
Opinion of the Court
The attorney for the appellant filed a motion for continuance in the court below on the ground that his health required rest and relief from trial work for several months. The motion was denied and subsequently the case dismissed for want of prosecution. The record shows that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for continuance and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- HILL v. CAPITAL TRANSIT CO.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published