U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1943

Hill v. Capital Transit Co.

Hill v. Capital Transit Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 17, 1943 · No. 8057 · Arnold, Edgerton, Groner
135 F.2d 948; 77 U.S. App. D.C. 391; 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3463 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Leroy S. Bendheim, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Arthur L. Willcher, of Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellant. Mr. Isadore H. Halpern, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellant., Mr. H. W. Kelly, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. R. E. Lee Goff, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee. Mr. S. R. Bowen, of Washington, D. G, also entered an appearance for appellee.

Hill v. Capital Transit Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The attorney for the appellant filed a motion for continuance in the court below on the ground that his health required rest and relief from trial work for several months. The motion was denied and subsequently the case dismissed for want of prosecution. The record shows that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for continuance and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.