U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1943

Hill v. Capital Transit Co.

Hill v. Capital Transit Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 17, 1943 · Arnold, Edgerton, Groner
135 F.2d 948; 77 U.S. App. D.C. 391; 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3463 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Hill v. Capital Transit Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The attorney for the appellant filed a motion for continuance in the court below on the ground that his health required rest and relief from trial work for several months. The motion was denied and subsequently the case dismissed for want of prosecution. The record shows that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for continuance and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.