Hill v. Capital Transit Co.
Hill v. Capital Transit Co.
135 F.2d 948; 77 U.S. App. D.C. 391; 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3463
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Hill v. Capital Transit Co.
Opinion of the Court
The attorney for the appellant filed a motion for continuance in the court below on the ground that his health required rest and relief from trial work for several months. The motion was denied and subsequently the case dismissed for want of prosecution. The record shows that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion for continuance and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.