U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1943

Vietti v. Wayne

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 29, 1943 · Edgerton, Miller, Parker

136 F.2d 771; 78 U.S. App. D.C. 19; 57 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 517; 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3130 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Benjamin B. Schneider, of Chicago, 111., with whom Mr. Lee B. Kemon, of Washington, D. C., was on the petition for petitioners., Mr. John H. Sutherland, of St. Louis, Mo., pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. John H. Bruninga, of St. Louis, Mo., and Charles E. Riordon, of Washington, D.C., were on the petition, for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Fern v. United States (9th Cir. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition in this case is for allowance of a special appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing petitioners’ complaint. The order sought to be challenged is a final one, from which an appeal in regular course is proper.1 No reason appearing to justify a special appeal, the petition was not granted. The case has now been dispostd of on appeal, in regular course,2 and an appropriate order will be entered denying the petition in the present case.

General Rules, U.S.Ct.App., Rules 9, 42(a); Federal Rules Civil Procedure, Rule 73, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; Rogers v. Watson, 7 Cir., 46 F.2d 753, certiorari denied 283 U.S. 852, 51 S.Ct. 561, 75 L.Ed. 1460; Hill v. Chicago & Evanston R. R., 140 U.S. 52, 54, 11 S.Ct. 690, 35 L.Ed. 331.

Vietti v. Wayne, - U.S.App.D.C. -, 136 F.2d 769, decided May 29, 1943.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.