Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1944

Corning Glass Works v. Coe

Corning Glass Works v. Coe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 10, 1944 · Groner, Miller, Proctor
141 F.2d 550; 79 U.S. App. D.C. 395; 61 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 544; 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3739 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Corning Glass Works v. Coe

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The findings and judgment of the trial court, 51 F.Supp. 232, find full support in the record. Appellant has failed to meet the burden imposed upon a plaintiff in a Section 4915 proceeding1 and is not entitled to a patent.

Affirmed.

35 U.S.C.A. § 63; Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D.C. 195, 197, 198, 109 F.2d 449, 451, 452; Daniels v. Coe, 73 App.D.C. 54, 58, 116 F.2d 941, 945; Morrison v. Coe, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 219, 220, 127 F.2d 737, 738.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑