U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1945

Creel v. Creel

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 21, 1945 · Arnold, Edgerton, Miller

149 F.2d 830; 80 U.S. App. D.C. 412; 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2693 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Edwin J. Creel, appellant pro se., Mr. Selig C. Brez, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Leon Tobriner, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Kissell v. Creel (District Court, District of Columbia 1949)
Creel v. Creel (D.C. Cir. 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appeals in Nos. 8770 and 8823 are dismissed, on motion of appellee, because each was taken from a non-appealable order.1 The judgment of the court in No. 8910 is affirmed, as an examination of the record reveals no error and requires the conclusion that the trial court properly execised its discretion in confirming the order of sale.

Nos. 8770 and 8823 dismissed.

No. 8910 affirmed.

See D.C.Code (1940) § 17 — 101; Butterfield v. Usher, 91 U.S. 246, 248, 23 L. Ed. 318; Dikeman v. Jewel Gold Mining Co., 9 Cir., 2 F.2d 665; Electric Boat Co. v. East Hampton Shipping Co., 2 Cir., 48 F.2d 542; The St. Paul, 2 Cir., 262 F. 1021, certiorari denied, 252 U.S. 578, 40 S.Ct. 344, 64 L.Ed. 725; Fidelity Storage Co. v. Jaques, 61 App.D.C. 337, 62 F.2d 876; King v. Harrington, 35 App.D.C. 111, 115; Cf. Chas. McCaul Co. v. Harr, 51 App.D.C. 111, 113, 276 F. 633, 635.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.