U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1946

Teichmann v. Parrish

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 28, 1946 · No. 9173

157 F.2d 75; 81 U.S. App. D.C. 217; 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2676 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. J. Harry Welch, of Washington, D. C. with whom Mr. H. Mason Welch, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Samuel B. Block and John R. Daily, both of Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for appellant., Mr. Robert H. McNeill, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has recovered damages for alleged negligent treatment administered to her by or under the direction of appellant as a physician. The evidence was conflicting. The principal question is whether the evidence favorable to appellee, if believed, supports the verdict. We find that it does. Appellant’s other assignments of error are also without merit.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.