Mikeska v. United States
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Joseph v. United States (District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania 1950)
- Cohn v. Cohn (D.C. Cir. 1948)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The case must be affirmed. The only questions involved are the intention of the insured soldier and whether or not he took such steps to effectuate his intention to change the beneficiary of his policy (if he had any such intention) as reasonably might be expected under the circumstances. We find nothing in the record to cause us to disturb the decision of Judge Letts based upon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which we therefore adopt
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.