U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1949

Neudecker v. Philpot

Neudecker v. Philpot
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 2, 1949
174 F.2d 668; 85 U.S. App. D.C. 28; 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2265 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Neudecker v. Philpot

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In dismissing on her own motion a wife’s complaint for divorce, the District Court denied counsel fees to her attorneys. They appeal from this denial.

In view of a later colloquy between court and counsel, it is not clear to us from the court’s memorandum and order whether (1) fees were denied on the theory that the court had no authority to award them in the circumstances of the particular case, or (2) the court decided, in the exercise of the discretion granted by the statute, D.C. Code 1940, § 16 — 410, that no fees should be awarded. We think the court had authority to award or deny fees and the exercise of its discretion was required. The case must therefore be remanded for a further order. If discretion was exercised by the appealed order, a new order denying fees or confirming the appealed order will be sufficient.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.