U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1950

Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 23, 1950 · Edgerton, Clark, Washington

179 F.2d 812; 86 U.S. App. D.C. 411 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. James M. Earnest, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Mr. Philip W. Amram, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Jerome J. Dick, Washington, D. G., was on the brief, for ap-pellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Richard L. Dehart and Phoebe D. Dehart, His Wife, D/B/A Dehart Oil Company v. Richfield Oil Corporation, a Corporation (9th Cir. 1968)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case involves interpretation of a contract for installing elevators in an office building in Washington, D. C. We agree with the District Court’s interpretation. Furthermore, appellant may not overturn a summary judgment by raising here an issue of fact that was not plainly disclosed as a genuine issue in the trial court. Fletcher v. Krise, 73 App.D.C. 266, 120 F.2d 809; Williams v. Kolb, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 253, 145 F.2d 344. Garrett Biblical Institute v. American University, 82 U.S.App.D.C., 265, 163 F.2d 265, is not to the contrary.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.