U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1950

Paul M. Ambrose and Crimora Research and Development Corporation v. John A. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents

Paul M. Ambrose and Crimora Research and Development Corporation v. John A. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 6, 1950 · Edgerton, Per Curiam, Prettyman, Washington
181 F.2d 272; 86 U.S. App. D.C. 413 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Paul M. Ambrose and Crimora Research and Development Corporation v. John A. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant Commissioner of Patents in,a suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain reissue of a patent with added claims. Quite apart from any question of estoppel, there was no substantial evidence of the “inadvertence, accident, or mistake” required by R.S. § 4916, 35 U.S.C.A. § 64. We express no opinion regarding the District Court’s ruling that the appellant was, as a matter of law, estopped to make the added claims.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.